Or if you want to do development work while offline.

Good to have fallbacks but in reality most ppl ( at least in the west) will have internet 99% of the time.

Sure, but I am not one of them. I find myself wanting to code on trains and planes pretty often, and so local toolchains are always attractive for me.

Is this some kind of mental problem that you want to tell people what they do and how they spend their money? Pretty jerk attitude IMO

"senior engineer level model" is the biggest cope I've ever seen

I will use a local coding model for our proprietary / trade secrets internal code when Google uses Claude for its internal code and Microsoft starts using Gemini for internal code.

The flip side of this coin is I'd be very excited if Jane Street or DE Shaw were running their trading models through Claude. Then I'd have access to billions of dollars of secrets.

> I'd be very excited if Jane Street or DE Shaw were running their trading models through Claude. Then I'd have access to billions of dollars of secrets.

Using Claude for inference does not mean the codebase gets pulled into their training set.

This is a tired myth that muddies up every conversation about LLMs

> This is a tired myth that muddies up every conversation about LLMs

Many copyright holders, and the courts would beg to differ.

lol yeah its weird to me why even ppl on HN can't wrap their heads around stateless calls.

unless you control both the client and the server, you cannot prove a call is stateless.