Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I’m further convinced in recent times that there is a general rule that always holds true:

More distributed = less corruption = more utopia.

So for example, fiat currency = bad. Gold trade = good.

Blockchain = good. Single network = bad.

On device AI = good. Open source AI and datasets = good. OpenAI and closed datasets = bad.

Electric cars charged at home = good. Electricity generated at home = good. A monopoly on electricity = bad.

Small forums = good. Reddit = bad. Social media giants = bad.

A local sheriff = good. An army = bad.





> Gold trade = good.

Look up the atrocities committed on the name of countries gaining more gold sometime then get back to us on that one.

> Blockchain = good. Single network = bad.

The CC networks have much lower fraud rates than the block chain does.

> Small forums = good. Reddit = bad. Social media giants = bad.

This forum is 100% a benevolent dictatorship and it works really well.

> A local sheriff = good. An army = bad.

Plenty of very corrupt local sheriffs. Horribly corrupt for that matter.

> On device AI = good. Open source AI and datasets = good. OpenAI and closed datasets = bad.

Agreed!


> This forum is 100% a benevolent dictatorship and it works really well.

Part of the reason why it does is because there are so many other places to go to. But that is exactly the decentralized model in practice - it's not really anarchy so much so as a lot of small dictatorships, benevolent or otherwise (but you're free to vote with your feet).


"Decentralize it" isn't a bad instinct in many contexts but I am sure you are capable of conjuring a counterexample to every one of the cases you mention with a modicum of effort/imagination.



Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: