How does that help though, if a charity uses an entirely raw unedited photo that is still totally fabricated or misleading?
I think that’s the real problem - it’s not really any better if a charity uses a paid actor on a set, or finds the absolute poorest person in the worst street in the country and uses their photos as if they’re representative of an entire country for the purpose of soliciting donations. If the AI pictures were actually representative of the situation then I wouldn’t think it’s all that bad.
I think that’s the real problem - it’s not really any better if a charity uses a paid actor on a set, or finds the absolute poorest person in the worst street in the country and uses their photos as if they’re representative of an entire country for the purpose of soliciting donations. If the AI pictures were actually representative of the situation then I wouldn’t think it’s all that bad.