Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The consumer can't articulate policy.

Consumers in a general sense don't know much of how the world works - safe radiation exposure, food safety, drug dosing thermodynamics, household electrical wiring, airborne particulate, airline maintenance...

This is why we have a government regulatory regime to protect them. The government has to strong arm companies out of bad behavior, because consumers do not understand.

Some people who have Apple and Google stock will voice opinion against regulation. Or people who really love their devices and don't understand the harms.

But the fact is that this Titanic command of markets damages the robustness of the economy. Google and Apple are doing massive harm.

Capitalism should be hard. It should be a treadmill. You shouldn't be able to coast.

We like the market. We like evolutionary pressure. Giants this large, however, are an ecological hack that get to escape the same algorithm we subject every other company to. They created an artificial and illegal means to prevent themselves from facing competition. They're an invasive species picking on ecosystems that literally cannot fight back.

It's a good thing that new companies can (or could) threaten old companies. It's a renewing forest fire, a de-ossification. It rewards innovation capital rather than institutions.

Apple and Google have found a way to forever avoid this by wedging themselves in as "owners of mobile computing". These two companies own it. Period. You don't. Consumers don't. No other company can even enter into the arena. You play by their rules.

Antitrust enforcement has never been more needed. We've had two decades of devices we really only rent and don't own. Devices that strangle consumer control over how we spend our time and money.

If America doesn't do it, foreign countries seeking sovereignty should.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: