In this situation, where you advocate for waiting until a different organization gives its opinion: while waiting, will net-more harm have occurred if Israel
1. reduces the volume and density of violence being acted on that territory, or
2. continues, as it is currently doing, to increase the volume and density of violence being acted on that territory
Is there a different answer, should this other organization’s opinion affirm or refute genocide?
Israel is under no obligation to stop. Not because of this report, nor even in the case of an ICJ ruling. I say I am waiting for the ICJ ruling to make up my mind on the matter. The rulings are inconsequential as far as the conflict.
1. reduces the volume and density of violence being acted on that territory, or 2. continues, as it is currently doing, to increase the volume and density of violence being acted on that territory
Is there a different answer, should this other organization’s opinion affirm or refute genocide?