If you don't believe that what we accepts as facts are politically influenced, I have a bridge to sell you...

What I don’t believe is that somebody bought Twitter only, or even primarily, to further their “class interests”. The whole framing here is bent.

> somebody

That he's the wealthiest known man in the world seems like relevant context here.

Also that he tried to back out and a judge forced him to buy it.

No one, not even the cringiest, wanna-be edge lord from 4chan spends $44B to buy Twitter unless they think there's value there. Even paying a big premium for Twitter. So what value does Musk see in Twitter? He's not going to make money off it. He bought a huge megaphone to push his social/class interests.

He sued to try to get out of buying it!

Cannabis with high CBD and minimal THC isn't a psychedelic, fyi.

Amazing you didn't get that point even after it was made explicitly clear three times, but you still remember my username 10 days later.

Also, asserting that someone who expresses class awareness and media literacy is dabbling in "alternative facts" and must be on some kind of psychedelic drugs is wildly uncalled for. This is the second time you've cast such aspersions on me for some reason - stop.

It's pretty depressing such derangement infiltrated HN. Psychedelics are really a fine line. Looking at SF as an outsider - it either mints billionaires or completely destroys people.