Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

One million launches per year seems to be adequate trade for 10% global emissions. This level of technology implies we are able to reduce emissions elsewhere.


I think it’s ludicrously optimistic to think that this would substitute for reductions elsewhere. What possible mechanism could reduce 10% of global co2 emissions when many of these launches will be tourists and starlinks?


1 million launches per year implies at least a decade or two of development. There is a lot that can change in that time - for example energy production can move towards renewable and nuclear. Few decades more and we might get fusion too.


I agree with you. I was just stating a fact, not criticizing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: