Yes, and I think that was a huge mistake. What is your point again?
edit: things can improve, women can open bank accounts without their husband approving it now! We decided something, re-evaluated and made a better decision
This takes us back to the beginning: how shall we determine when the social process has failed, and what constitutes "improvement"?
Society has already spoken on this matter. It seems that your criteria amount to nothing more than "when I personally dislike the results of the social process, the social process has failed, and we ought to revisit it."
So I ask again the question you've begged: by what formula or philosophy are we to determine when a social decision such as "allow gambling" is bad? Is there anything beyond your personal feelings on a topic that we can turn to as a criterion?
edit: things can improve, women can open bank accounts without their husband approving it now! We decided something, re-evaluated and made a better decision