So starting in 1983 that's roughly five conversions a year assuming the figure of 200 people in the article. So a 1,000 years to get through all 5k members according to bruceb's post. The man is a legend but it goes to show how difficult it is to deradicalise people who are deep in an ideology of hate. Something relevant to think about with things going on around the world right now.
Stopping people from going down the rabbit hole in the first place is really the only viable long-term solution - easier done with individuals than entire communities sharing that ideology as the norm.
I tried to do that in college and all I got was the FBI listing me as a white supremacists.
It turns out the KKK member I tried to befriend was working for the FBI and the university I was attending. He was there to fake a white supremacists movement so they could cancel all the merit based scholarships and replace them with race based scholarships
It's an impressive accomplishment and obviously kind of a marvel that this is what he feels called to do. Only respect for the man and his activism.
But I hate the tone that often emerges when this is brought up or referenced, especially common since 2020. As if Davis's approach is the correct way for black people to address the racism of white people, contrasted against the "wrong" ways like BLM protests and organized direct action.
The man put himself in significant danger over many years. For impressive and personally meaningful but ultimately very small scale victories. That can't be the standard we expect from black activists. White racism is a problem white people are obligated to solve. If you are are white it is your role to be doing this, don't make a black man do it for you.
No one made him. If anything this should be a way to inspire people to do what they can as opposed to setting a standardized, mass marketed (see BLM) form of activism
BLM and Davis' approach is akin to Hamas or the IRA vs Gandhi or Mandela's approach. You can either let people discover the truth and convince themselves, or you can wage war on them. Just that the former way often leads to lasting damage.
And in the mean time if they are waging war on you you are to die politely and silently.
State powers also learned from nonviolent movements. Like what are some major nonviolent protest movements against state oppression that have significantly achieved their goals in the last 50 years?
Their success depended on certain social and political factors that simply no longer exist. We are encouraged to consider them the perfect form of resistance precisely because they are not effective right now.
> State powers also learned from nonviolent movements. Like what are some major nonviolent protest movements against state oppression that have significantly achieved their goals in the last 50 years?
Uhh, the apartheid movement in South Africa? The Bolivian Water Protests? Lech Walesa and Solidarity in Poland? The fall of the Soviet Union?
The weakest link against nonviolent civil disobedience movements is precisely that - polite deaths and killings come out strongly in the international media for every country to see. What's changed is the lack of action by the erstwhile guardians of freedom and democracy.
For an example of such pressure, look at how much pressure the US put on the UK under FDR and Truman against British brutality in India, or how the entire third world reacted against the apartheid regime in South Africa, jointly. Sure, some people will die, but they'll die as heroes instead of "terrorists" and the like.
The KKK may be a shadow of its former size and power but that has just lead to lots of smaller groups with similar beliefs forming that aren't so attention-grabbing.
Not smaller, bigger - racist and anti-semitic conspiracy theories have been normalized in American culture now, to the point that American politicians can espouse their belief in replacement theory or cultural Marxism without significant backlash.
The KKK is a weird cultish circus with its robes and "wizards" and "dragons" but what do they matter when we elect Presidents who openly describe Mexican immigrants as rapists and say Haitians all have AIDS and Nigerian immigrants should "go back to their huts in Africa." And that's not to single out one party, both are endemically racist (the Democrats consider themselves entitled to black votes,) and, unlike the Klan, actually exercise real political power and cultural influence.
Between that and white liberals insisting on "racial blindness" rather than confronting racism where it exists, including their own white privilege, it seems like this guy is trying to save the Titanic from sinking with a teacup. It's an effort, but ultimately futile.
Stopping people from going down the rabbit hole in the first place is really the only viable long-term solution - easier done with individuals than entire communities sharing that ideology as the norm.