I am working on a little hobby golf app. Essentially, have LLMs step in as a virtual caddie, providing shot selection options based on course layout, player distances and tendencies, and weather.
I am working on a project to try to quantify exactly this. Where are our standard assets and demos creating obstacles rather than opening doors? Are there opportunities to deliver something to the customer that will accelerate processes, based on all other deals that have been worked on.
It would require a number of transactions as there is no single other shareholder that owns 51% in this case. So you can do a large number of transactions in a short window, which would cause the price to skyrocket. Additionally, there are disclosure requirements in place once a single shareholder reaches 5%+ ownership. Once the word gets out, everyone else starts buying.
Managers are better thought of as "agents of capital or ownership" under this distinction. Manager compensation would typically be at least partially tied to overall company performance, even without equity (e.g. cash bonuses for a strong P+L). Employees, as a group distinct from the Managers, earn a flat wage regardless of performance.
Of course, this is industry/location/company dependent, but I believe that is the reasoning for the distinction.
In Dan Carlin's Hardcore History episode about the Nuclear Age, he makes a similar point about chess. The American leaders at that time didn't play chess, they played bridge as it simulated a more dynamic environment with a lot of missing information.
I am working on a tool called Playbook (https://useplaybook.app). Playbook is an application that allows anyone who presents product demos to tell a more complete, integrated story.
One of the primary features of many SaaS products is how they integrate smoothly with other platforms customers are already using, like Salesforce or Slack. However, in a demo environment, it can be difficult to show that workflow in a way that doesn't require flipping between persona accounts and taking precious time to generate the activity. Playbook hooks into a demoer's demo accounts and facilitates creating "plays", automated workflows between any number of SaaS apps that show off your product's integrations. It also supports working with multiple personas to create lifelike collaboration instantly.
There are still many kinks to work out but this is the first step in building Demo Engineering-as-a-service.
I can't remember which thread it was, but there was a lengthy discussion about what qualifies as a tech company and whether something like AirBnB was a "tech" company. It was a distinction I had also struggled with, but this article provided clarity for me. What these companies deliver for their customers may not necessarily be traditional tech (lodging, delivery, etc) but the way they accomplish this is definitely a technical achievement.
Yeah, as an engineer it's hard for me to think of anything that doesn't have motors or sensors or at least PCBs as "tech". But I've also been a programmer for 30 years so I can appreciate pure SW projects that are hidden from the end-user as technical achievements. So at first things like AirBnB or travel search engines don't seem very techy but once these apps or websites are past their initial clunky releases there's a lot of hard work in the background that makes for a pleasant user experience.
