I'm looking at something like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4Dc6QNWiIs and I feel like they are doing totally different things. Both harvest tomatoes, but these are totally different approaches.
It really doesn't get more sensible and sustainable than kids playing team sports and parents witnessing this part of their lives. The blame here is squarely on PEs like black bear nickel and dimming parents. How do you pull the plug on that? It's so gross.
Sure you're right, if that's their thing, having their kids perform the sport and watching them doing it then this is a good solution. The streaming makes it so they can even stay in the car and watch from there.
Pour a rink on someone's land. Play on basketball courts or blacktops instead of rinks. It's not the same, but walking to work surely wasn't the same as riding the bus. If you can't show them that you can live without them, they'll treat you like you're dependent on them.
We were 5 people total - PO, Scrum Master, 3 devs. Been years since I was in that team but it was expected that everyone would give a lengthy update about the previous day
That's 12 minutes a person. How much time did it take 3 devs to say "I worked on 12343, I plan on working on 12354, no blockers"? I assume it was the PO/SM that drug it out?
Product managers shouldn't be rebranded as "solution managers." The title suggests they can handle solutions, but most lack the chops to solve real problems effectively.
That takes 2 seconds. But the PO usually expected a detailed breakdown of what went well or bad and what could be improved right then and there. Simply saying "Yeah, I'm doing X, still doing it, bye" would be bad, because you're also not inviting _collaboration_.
Do we know how that relates to actual operating cost? My understanding is that this is below cost price because we're still in the investor hype part of the cycle where they're trying to capture market share by pumping many millions into these companies and projects
Does this really reflect the resource cost of finding this vulnerability?
It sounds like a crazy amount to me. I can run code analyzers/sanitizers/fuzzers on every commit to my repo at virtually no cost. Would they have caught a problem like this? Maybe not, certainly not without some amount of false positives. Still this LLM approach costs many millions of times more than previous tooling, and might still have brought up nothing (we just don't read the blog posts about those attempts).
I think WhatsApp is still using Erlang and they are biggest messaging app in the world. Discord is using Elixir but it's more niche. I think if you look at use cases where they excel, you will find them there.
Overkill I suppose, in the past for similar stuff I've used a microcontroller with a GPRS modem, but since the 2g switch off I'm not sure it can be done that simply.
Their security team should vet all of these devices, create environments where it's safe for them to be on the network, and ensure they're kept up to date also?
The point is they shouldn’t need to test everything and someone self submitting an add on for review to be featured isn’t what triggers an additional device.
Does toilet training your cat introduce a significant health hazard through toxoplasma gondii into the surrounding environment? It's so hard to tell if your local wastewater plant takes care of this...
I could have sworn I read something to this effect, that this is ill advised because waste treatment plants aren’t really equipped to handle animal parasites
