Thanks for sharing, could you please comment on the performance aspect vis-a-vis json reader/writer provided by pydantic

Though not Github, worth mentioning Huggingface, which is also using git, but managing large files with their(?) xet protocol. https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/en/xet/index

GitHub Actions are amazing ! For a public repository who will give you a free machine to run for 6 hours at a stretch for a job !!

This thread is largely commentary on the technical aspects of GitHub Actions.

The fact the business gives away free compute is irrelevant and more a discussion of their marketing budget.

Will OSS (public) repositories also have to pay if they use self-hosted GitHub runners ? If yes, that seems a bit counterintuitive, given that Github hosted runners are free for public repos.

Why would a public repo use a self-hosted runner ? because the self-hosted runner storage available is only 14GB !!

Github, thanks for making this service available free for public repos, it's a big boon. Currently the runner has only 14GB of disk space, if that can be made to 50 GB, that would be amazing !

Wish GitHub markdown would support Vega-lite to create charts that would be a great combination.

Here is a brief discussion on the same https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/16963

> Lots of little technical reasons why not.

What are some?

Does it have Gantt chart ?

Yes but we still develops

Windows service for tracking how much time I spend in each app.

Using parquet in python requires installing pyarrow and numpy, whereas CSV comes with stdlib.

Also, the csv has a very pythonic interface vis-a-vis parquet, in most cases if I can fit the file in memory I would go with CSV.

Safari finally has the Chrome feature that I miss the most, ability to create separate app like experience for a particular website.