Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more moasda's commentslogin

financial.com FDC India | Kochi (Kerala, India) | ONSITE (up to 50% remote) | Full-time

We're hiring for roles in Kochi including:

- IT Team Leader (for an agile team with JavaScript and Java developers and QA)

- Java Backend Developer (microservice development)

Tech stack includes Java, Kafka, MariaDB, JavaScript, TypeScript, Vue, Kubernetes, Docker, Jenkins, Git

financial.com provides web applications to visualize financial data for traders and investors. We develop and host tailor-made solutions for banks, exchanges and authorities.

More information and apply at https://www.financial.com/careers/


financial.com | Kochi (Kerala, India) | ONSITE (up to 50% remote) | Full-time

Tech stack includes Java, Kafka, MariaDB, JavaScript, TypeScript, Vue, Kubernetes, Docker, Jenkins, Git

financial.com provides web applications to visualize financial data for traders and investors. We develop and host tailor-made solutions for banks, exchanges and authorities.

We're hiring for roles in Kochi including:

- IT Team Leader (for an agile team with JavaScript and Java developers and QA)

- Java Backend Developer (microservice development)

More information and apply at https://www.financial.com/careers/


The article isn't correct in all arguments:

> However, you won’t be getting the advanced features like automation or other integration...

Codeberg also has built-in CI support using Woodpecker (ci.codeberg.org). It works very well.

> However, if you are interested in a privacy-friendly GitHub alternative from Europe, I suggest you check out Codeberg.

Important to know that Codeberg only allows to host projects with a FLOSS license. So I wouldn't announce it as a GitHub alternative without a further note.


I've had a lot of discussions with developers on this topic. It seems to be difficult for developers to delete code even if it is versioned in Git, so the code is not really lost.

I regularly encourage my teams to delete code that has no use in the near future. Because every line of code in the production environment leads to maintenance effort, so this would save their time.


How often (say what % of PRs) do teams end up doing it?


I had to solve a similar issue in two teams. I'm not against documentation, but this wouldn't have solved the issue in my case. Documentation was available, but you couldn't clearly know if it's still up-to-date or which use case would be the right one.

The solution was to dissolve head monopolies. The best developer in the team was very supportive and tried to solve all problems himself instead of involving his colleagues to make them more independent from him. This was not malicious intent, but just helpfulness oriented to short-term solutions.

So it was a structural cause that could only be solved from outside the team.


tl;dr: humans produce a different odour when under pressure – and dogs can sniff it out

Amazing result


What if you offered multiple (3?) user groups with different storage volumes?


Maybe not modern enough but I like to use Lazarus to create native desktop applications. It compiles to several platforms with a small footprint. It's based on Free Pascal.

https://www.lazarus-ide.org/


For me, Firebug was a game changer in web development. It has set a new standard.


For sure. I think Firebug, Gmail and Google Maps are approximately of the same age and they all opened up a new era, showing the way to a more modern web. I am unsure if the Web 2.0 moniker applies to what happened around this time but I think it was around then too.


Isn't Web 2.0 the web with user-contributed content, i.e. social media? For me, being part of Web 2.0 would not be something to be proud about, it's the tech that brought uninformed, angry populist rage online...


I think Web 2.0 was more when the web became more interactive. Instead of only static web pages there were forums, UIs that responded to your actions, and early social networks (but not the modern monsters we currently have). It enabled them, but it wasn't strictly "Web 2.0".


Yes, Web 2.0 is about XHR and interactive UIs.

That said, even at the time the definition was not really clear. I remember a joke, why Web 2.0 is like teen sex... Everyone is talking about it, almost noone is doing it, and even those that are, are probably doing it wrong.

Fun times. You could change the image without reloading the page. Woohoo!


:-D


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: