Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lostlogin's commentslogin

I laughed.

I worked in an office with sketchy power.

The lights would flicker and the non-macs would turn off. The Macs just carried on. Mini, iMac, Mac Pro.

Yay for big caps I guess?


Right now I’m sitting in front of a hotel tv with speakers that are so crap that we are putting the sound through the MacBook to improve things.

> Where are the vids of someone throwing a MacBook Air down the stairs and the thing keeps working?

For some anecdata, I have:

Stood on mine Poured water on it. Been hit by a car while cycling and fallen on it. Dropped it.

It’s fine. Has a few scratches and a small dent. The predecessor is a 2013 Air which has had a hard life. It’s going great.

A colleague put a piece of a4 paper between keyboard and screen then closed it, squeezed it and cracked the screen. Don’t do that.


> I’ve noticed one of them is kind of warped from walking around the office holding it that way.

That’s not at all reassuring.


What’s dishonest about wanting a quicker boot time?

Saying it "saves lives"?

It probably doesn't save lives, except maybe in some extreme scenarios. But it does save life. Time, the most precious resource, even more precious than money.

Saying 'it saves life' might sound less dramatic. Using a corporate windows machine certianly feels like self harming, and if I was at a low ebb, it could potentially be fatal.

Mine apply overnight while I sleep. As long as they don’t mess with my alarm or brick try device, the time doesn’t matter.

My sisters iPad just bricked itself during an update, and nothing I've tried has been able to revive it. And it's an unrepairable disposable piece of tech, so it's going into a landfill.

https://www.apple.com/environment/

LOL


Apple will take back all devices and recycle them. Please do not let her put it in a landfill.

I read the parent comment differently:

The corollary of not knowing when [non-neurotypicals are] offending people, is that they also don't know when they're receiving tolerance


> This article is equivalent to calling the Boeing 737 unsafe because it's had the most Full Lost Events while completely ignoring it's flown 238.84M flights (which is basically more than the entire rest of the list combined).

You don’t get many people calling the MAX a good plane.

If you include in the count a new model which arguable should never have been allowed to be called the same plane, then yes, your prior good record looks ok. Over various generations the hull loss rate had come down to 0.18 per million flights while the MAX is at 1.48 per million flight.


How does this relate to the CGM analogy?

Manufacturers update software periodically on these devices, so each new generation is a MAX to some degree.

It's a bad analogy, and the 737 MAX is a bad plane

> iOS autocomplete for the longest time was just absolutely insane.

As well as what you describe, it starts to hate me uncertain words. I have a colleague called An. iOS hates this and changes it. It does it when you are a line away from the word too. It’s painful.

I have to type ‘TE’ regularly too, an abbreviation for echo time.

If you’re on iOS, try it. I have resorted to typing TEE and then hitting delete to remove a E and then carrying on.


Larkin wrote that his mower had 'stalled, twice' and that he found 'A hedgehog jammed up against the blades, / Killed.’

It’s a seriously pathetic mower that would be jammed by a hedgehog.


We tend to underestimate the progress we managed to make in the last 100 years or so. There was a small TV segment showing the earliest vacuum cleaners. Both vacuum and cleaning looks like wishful thinking compared to what we have today.

Heck, the rechargeable vacuum I have at home has more power than what I used to the one I plugged to the wall ~20 years ago. Reducing the cost of CFD via higher performance computers did wonders in efficient system design, and that's just one aspect of life.

We have 1.5L Turbo / Hybrid engines which can propel the vehicle quicker than a run of the mill V6 of yore, too, and I find this amazing.

I always wanted to have a bigger engine because of the agility in emergency conditions. Now the bog standard car has more agility than I even dreamed of.


I suspect that a 1970s mower for UK garden use was typically not very beefy. Wikipedia thinks Larkin had some kind of Victa.

We grew up with an '80s Victa, but it was one of the super 600 slashers with a newer 5hp engine. He probably didn't have a slasher, but the rest of their lineup used similar engines and weren't especially underpowered.

If his model was anything like ours, a hedgehog could probably crawl between the blade disc (not the blades but the thing they're attached to) and the chassis and get itself wedged in there.


Probably a reel mower. A wet fart will clog a reel mower. They were real popular back in the day.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: