Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jkestner's commentslogin

1. Start more fires

2. Find more fires

3. Profit

Like any good startup.


Maybe Flock sales was going door-to-door in your area.

Sedona (with a handy timeline of how they accomplished it) https://livefreeaz.com

Bend, OR https://www.opb.org/article/2026/01/08/bend-flock-cameras-ai...

Hays County, TX https://www.kxan.com/news/hays-county-votes-to-terminate-flo...

Lockhart, TX preemptively rejected them https://www.kxan.com/news/local/caldwell-county/lockhart-cit...

Working on it in our city. Flock has been their own worst enemy—once people know the name of the company, they start seeing it in the news regularly. Start talking to people, show up at city meetings.


That laggy behavior plus indexing not appearing to find some obvious files made me switch to Raycast.


Raycast looks really cool, thanks


Same. It’s closed source and has a subscription fee, but I’m all in on Raycast.

You only have to pay for the Pro version. As a replacement for Spotlight the free version does great for me.

In my experience, people respond much more strongly to naming a specific company or person. Clearer plan of action than a resigned “This tech is old news.”


Is the plan of action "eliminate all public IP cameras"? That's coherent, I'd get it, but that doesn't seem to be what he's saying at all. He used a Google search to find exposed Flock admin consoles (interesting! say more about that!) but he could just as easily have just searched "open IP cameras"; there's sites that do nothing but index those.


If your takeaway from that comment is that ‘tptacek thinks Flock’s tech is old news and he’s resigned about it, I think you’re going to be in for a treat.


What queer book with that content was in libraries?


I suspect that whatever example they had in mind, it's a passage that is descriptive of someone's personal experience while not being prescriptive in telling the reader step-by-step how to follow in their footsteps.


A friend of mine in school had a similar thought - make body cams so cheap that everyone has one. Watch the watchmen.

I’ve considered making this a commercial reality, but we’ve seen that ubiquitous cameras don’t necessarily stop cops or authoritarians from kneeling on your neck, if they don’t feel shame.


Facial recognition databases of public sector employees will be the straw that breaks this camel's back.


I specifically have considered this in terms of protecting workers from (otherwise private or hidden) workplace abuse.


Two thoughts:

1. Amazon blink is an interesting hardware platform. With a power-optimized SoC, they achieve several years of intermittent 1080P video on a single AA battery. A similar approach and price point for body cam / dash cam would free users from having to constantly charge.

2. If you're designing cameras to protect human rights, you'll have to carefully consider the storage backend. Users must not lose access to a local copy of their own video because a central video service will be a choke point for censorship where critical evidence can disappear.


AR / AI glasses will be this.


I don't know. Is it better that it's obvious or not? I was thinking a buttonhole camera linked to your phone with an LED indicator when recording.


I’m embarrassed to admit how readily I overlooked the “on” in “buttonhole”, and even more embarrassed how afraid I became when your post still made sense.

Well, for certain fringe definitions of “sense”.


Art doesn’t smoothly fit in, it imposes.

Clearly there’s a market for Netflix background noise, but no one’s going to theme parks for that.


I’m not sure what you’re trying to say here.


_Disney_ needs to buy mindshare? From the company that’s happy to steal it anyway?

This feels like more funny accounting.


I wouldn’t rule either|both out.

None of the companies you see on TV need to buy mindshare - because they did yesterday, and will again tomorrow - so why not save today’s spend?

Out of sight, out of mind: especially as media consumption towards individual creators.


I would love to know why Siri has clearly deteriorated. I assume it’s opaquely failing due to server infrastructure not keeping up. Thought device-side was supposed to help with that. That’s another thing I’d like to understand — what are the moving parts to Siri?


If only the application of the law was as binary as code.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: