He urgently came to the previous administration along with a committee, presenting a plan for the construction of Nuclear Power Plants, focused on serving datacenters for AI, with the excuse that, if the US don't do this, China will do, and he or his team not even consulted the IAEA for this topic.
He might have a point but, still looks like the Salesperson of a Insurance company. The idea is not absurd, but the approach and the speech, seems quite cheap.
I see nothing on his talks that are genuine about solving crucial problems of the humanity...
Clear to me that he's very into keeping the costumer (investors) satisfied.
Sometimes I think we are in a kind of civilization downgrade, but no one wants to talk about it. This initiative by Sam, proves my (not so wacky) theory.
Funny though is that if you share this kind of stuff on Linkedin, people just look away. Indeed, it's not a place to say what you think: it's all about look nice and please anyone who's capable of giving you a job, even if it's some Big Tech dictator.
I understand. There might be great reasons to not step up and say what is wrong, even when the truth is obvious...
Not the objective of the post but, it still creeps me out that, we don't have on Linkedin, a space to say what what it's (undoubtly) wrong.
It's part of our daily lives as workers, to say that we have an elephant in the room, even if it's with a company and it's eerie intentions towards the humanity, just to please shareholders and keep its value in the stock market.
Fear is a great motivator to stay silent, which should be bothering people…especially people claiming to want government to stay out of their personal lives.
Sadly, in the end, people are generally more selfish than righteous.
Would you mind to explain your point, please? I'd be glad to learn more about it, for so far, I cannot agree with your comment, based on hands-on testing and documentations. Thanks.
Me too, thanks. Would be nice if you can share some articles that you wrote regarding the matter, so I can have more inspiration. Looking forward to read them and learn from different examples and not the same "boiler plate" example that you can find on any DBMS documentation.
In Postgresql, the default ISOLATION LEVEL is "READ COMMITTED", which by standard, allows "NON-REPEATABLE READ" phenomena.
When Transaction on the LEFT is COMMITTED (adding 100 to balance), the Transaction on the RIGHT will add 400 to a balance of 1100, and not to a balance of 1000 (reading NON-REPEATED value).
You can do better than leaving this kind of comment that does not contribute in anything.
I don't get your comment, to be quite honest.
Besides, I don't like 3rd party A.I. services: the content that you see, is the content that I wrote.
And this comment of yours seems more of something to offend than to contribute.
I feel bad for you.
Karma Whore? That's how you speak with people trying to share contents here? Does that does in favor of the rules then?
Buddy, I feel bad for you. I hope you may have someone to love you on this Sunday, for you really need it. Don't be like that. Have a good day.
It seems you can’t see the comment I’m replying to because it’s been flagged and hidden if your settings are set that way – I am not talking about your article, I have no problem with it!
Generally I say: "let's make a good effort, to not let a bug pop-up on the user's face." Hehehe.
Particularly, I love documentation. Doesn't need to be a gigantic comment at the beginning of each function/method, but the Business Rule that the code is about, must be explained. Without this, maintaining and improving a code base for whatever service, might be a 'seek 'n hide' + 'riddle' game, and to be honest, I don't like it, at all.
Logging is a good thing too, essentially, if the application is on debug mode. Makes life much easier for gigantic code bases.
Since a gray-beard guy mentioned these four, they make more sense to me, who have a black-beard, yet.