Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | flukus's commentslogin

If something like this is financially viable (doubt) then it sounds like the density already exists and the problem is the restaurants aren't near the people. All the replies are focused on the density you mentioned but mixed use is probably the bigger and far more easily solved problem.

Letting restaurants open nearby to where there are clearly a lot of people is a tried and proven solution, not gadgetbhan for food.


Probably quite circular too, the labor costs are high because the housing/COL was allowed to become so high.


Flight booking systems still seem to be stuck with it, even newer fields like email are always in all caps.


Probably because it's a CICS program written in Cobol running on a mainframe.


Mine was around then too, mostly because the geocities page builder applet was such a dog.


Geocities, a blast from the past. My first web host.


A more charitable interpretation might be that getting under the cut off is why it's one of the first treatments available. More treatments will become available as the overall costs start beating out the costs of living with $disease.


> yet we tend to only hear about how humans need to cut back

There's also financial reasons to do so, with livestock the financial reasons are likely reversed.

Beside that, anti-biotics also have side effects that can make you more sick, their use is not just unnecessary but counter productive. Some of the side effects can be serious and long term, like changing your gut bacteria.


> It's got to be way easier to hire Angular developers than it is to hire someone who wants to eek out the maximum performance with this lightest-weight approach.

I disagree, at least around here. Frontend developers with react/angular experience are a hot commodity and really hard to hire, yet just about anyone from any tech tech can knock out html and some minimal css.


It seems endemic, especially everywhere that's not a product company. I think it was mythical man month (maybe earlier) that pointed out the 90% of the cost of software is in maintenance, yet 50 years on this cost isn't accounted for in project planning.

Consultancies are by far the worst, a project is done and everyone moves on, yet the clients still expect quick fixes and the occasional added feature but there's no one familiar with the code base.

Developers don't help either, a lot move from green field to green field like locusts and never learn the lessons of maintaining something, so they make the same mistakes over and over again.


If nothing loads nothing gets cached and you can get in a cycle of very slow 404s.

The current abomination I'm working on avoids this by caching the errors and serving them for several hours...


One of the worst outages I witnessed was due to negative DNS caching on the most outer router that took the company a few (3 or 5) working days to fix *after* issue was identified.


Is this a designed self-cache poisoning? Abomination indeed.


Hiring a car for specific trips is probably much better, depending on the % of those use cases. That goes for other factors like towing capacity too.

Cars are already very expensive for something with such a low utilisation rate.


Towing actually seems in practice an awful place for renting. Use case is taking kids trailer camping: UHaul at least offers only trucks with (a) single row seating, and (b) no brake controller. Even if spouse did drive, the lack of the brake controller is a showstopper.

If someone knows where I can rent a crewcab with RV brake controllers, I'm all ears. I'd love to not have to own a tow vehicle.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: