And then the AI doesn’t handle the front end caching properly for the 100th time in a row so you edit the owl and nothing changes after you press save.

It’s the thought organization equivalent of the Britany Spears head shaving. It’s a mental breakdown and the person suffering from the mental health issue at its root is processing their behavior by writing about it. It’s mental illness.

Deleting notes to mental illness is quite the leap.

So you didn’t actually take the time to read the article.

Nowhere in the article did this seem to equate to a “mental breakdown” in my view either. Your perspective on this might be flavored by your own non-universal values/experiences.

This is just fun and fantastic. Love it.

Was this platform built by vibe coding?

No, it wasn't.

Just the landing page according to their other comment, but the basic errors in pricing don’t inspire confidence in the rest of their system…

To be fair though, their answers to some other questions here seemed thorough, but I don’t know much about finance so for all I know those are just AI slop lol.

I can’t wait to see what machined aluminum experience they come up with together.

Man why did these guys do that OpenAI couldn’t replicate for less than 3Bn on reasonable timeline? This seems insane.

They have an old-school enterprise sales operation that is doing superb work. Apart from that, ChatGPT's projects are useless crap (can't read other convos in a project; can't generate project documents from a convo), and so clearly they would get value out of just getting some developers who have built anything of use to a poweruser.

They've got users (which I don't doubt that OpenAI's fork of VSC would have as well but I assume that's their thought process)

Yup. Even a small market share is market share. Plus they are paying to acquire a team of folks who are already in this space and who will, until golden handcuffs come off, keep working in this space. Still an insane number though.

But openai is stronger brand with free publicity - whatever they say/do will instantly show up the same day on all news across the world.

The "space" exists for months, there are no people with 10y expertise here, with their brand they can attract any talent they can wish for in this "space", no?

You can probably vibe code 80% of it in a week or two?

I guess it's all up to interpretation, but having a brand in one space doesn't necessarily translate to a brand in another. OpenAI doesnt/didnt have a code editor. Now it does/it will.

I'm fairly into llms but it took me awhile to try cursor because the cost of changing editors is very high. I'd probably eventually try a OpenAI editor but only if I saw it was actually getting adoption and good feedback from others.

I'd also argue that while this llm powered editor space is pretty new, the editor space in general is much older.

> You can probably vibe code 80% of it in a week or two?

Apparently, no. And the low quality of all OpenAI apps is proof of that.

I would switch in heartbeat if openAI built something equivalent.

I guess $3B of vibe coding credits with ChatGPT can't create Cursor.

It’s hard for me to respond to these kinds of posts with anything other than a dismissive sentiment along the lines of “grats on being rich and playing your rich people sport. I’m sorry you don’t like your rich people sport anymore. Hope your next rich people sport is fun for you.”

You got it right, this post is directed at other rich(er) people.

> It’s hard for me to respond to these kinds of posts with anything other than a dismissive sentiment

Nobody's forcing you to respond, you know?

I get your point. Still, there are other ways to respond, even if they are difficult. One is to be curious and take what you can from it.

Another is to think about people poorer and less fortunate than yourself who might look at you dimly for what you take for granted.

I’m not saying that morality is relative, but points of view sure are.

Am I missing something? It looked like the findings were all done from surveying people instead of actually measuring anything objectively?

Surveying people is pretty important in a study like this, and valid science.

Regardless, if you read the paper, you'd learn that they did do objective measurements, namely etCO2 levels and bio-markers from saliva.

Of note: "when etCO2 fell below approx. 20 mmHg, it was virtually guaranteed to trigger at least some (and often a strong) departure from ordinary waking consciousness. This effect is particularly intriguing because in non-breathwork-related circumstances, an etCO2 of 20 mmHg or less would be considered a sign of severe physiological malfunctions, e.g. of the heart or lungs"

But anyone who tried breathwork, especially in group settings with accompanying music, knows such practices can lead to intense trance-like states.

Remember when people thought Superhuman was the next thing?

It still sorta..is?

I know of and have seen a lot of very important founders and CEOs who still all swear by Superhuman.

The same people who thought that sort of thing, probably over-invested.

Once they (investors) have realized that there is no growth or anything to extract, or a lack of further fundraising, then it is written off and they move on.

They need to work on growth.

they're certainly working on it in this comments section