i’ve interviewed with aws and received offers twice over the years. the first time they made me pay for my own lunch. the second time no lunch break was afforded. i didn’t accept the offers though i know several truly excellent people who work there.
When I interviewed at a Google outpost, a good-cop employee they mistakenly thought had a connection to me took me to lunch (message: forget about the bad-cop interviewer you were just with, you're among friends, loosen your tongue so our spy can report back) in their cafeteria (message: look at the free food perks you'd enjoy), and initiated a conversation with an visiting economist there who then spoke of something oddly relevant to my research interest at the time (message: look at the interesting people and collaborations you will bump into every day).
Your interview lunch experience sounds like message: this is what it's going to be like, and we don't care if you join us.
I've been on the other side of that (not google), taking people to lunch who are interviewing. Usually you're picked because they're from the same country as you or something like that. At least where I work it's not like those messages. Instead it's lunch because food is good to have, and if you were lunching with them you weren't involved in the interview process at all, and it gave them a person to ask questions of and get an unbiased-as-reasonable response. If there were real red flags I'd probably raise it, but otherwise I had no contact with anyone in the hiring process regarding that person at all.
I don't know what percentage of companies use the lunch in an on-site interview for evaluation, but definitely some do. Either with express feedback into the process, or because it's the hiring manager taking the person to lunch, and this is shaping their opinion.
I suppose some could also use it as a refresher break, from their battery of antagonistic one-way LeetCode hazings, or a chance to give the person a more comfortable feeling about the company (not otherwise permitted by their hazing process).
That’s weird, both times that I interviewed for Amazon (admittedly pre-pandemic) they paid for flights, hotels, and all meals, including lunch. The lunch was basically either before or after your interview (depending on whether you had an afternoon or morning interview schedule) and you just grabbed whatever you want on your own. But it was expected to be expensed just like all other interview expenses.
i’m afraid i’ll look back and regret that i didn’t capture 3d memories of parents and grandparents when it was technically feasible because of a few dollars…
Well, there are stereo cameras… The digital ones came and went with 3D TVs though so you have to go to eBay. I am enjoying the stereo cameras I have accumulated though.
It eats batteries but you can get a charger and more batteries the way you would have a few mirrorless generations ago.
My trouble is not really having a system to show these to people, red/green anglyohs sometimes work fret but aren’t consistent, there doesn’t seem to be an ‘instagram’ for sharing stereo photos, it ought to be easy to make a WebXR application to show stereograms but I haven’t seen a fully realized one and found texture memory limits are a bitch in the MQ3 so my first attempt to make one got stuck.
I've taken to (tediously) printing stereogram cards for the better 3D photos.
I wrote this to take the .MPO files (a common file format on the earlier commercial digital stereo cameras) and convert them to print-ready stereograms: https://github.com/EngineersNeedArt/Stereographer
I imagine so. I understand that Opera GX, for example, provides a specialized version to Russian IPs that locks down the search engines that can be used.
Including the US right? And I don't mean in a conspiratorial sense. Just in the sense that they wouldn't deny it because it's their home country (Say Windows certs or Google certs), and at the very least they can issue warrants, gag orders, or triple letter agency bypasses.
Now it only sounds weird when a country exherts their national sovereignity because the US doesn't need to perform any additional steps to install any of their Certs, they have hundreds of them by design.
> Including the US right? And I don't mean in a conspiratorial sense. Just in the sense that they wouldn't deny it because it's their home country (Say Windows certs or Google certs), and at the very least they can issue warrants, gag orders, or triple letter agency bypasses.
Yeah. I don't think the US explicitly requires it but they don't have to, there are more than enough US-based entities with root certificates who they could send a National Security Letter to if they ever wanted one. (Also the US FKPI root certificate is at least shipped by some vendors, although it seems to be disabled by default)
having crossed one of these superlative Guizhou bridges i can attest to their ability to inspire a sense of wonder like other large-scale human accomplishments.
one of the things i took away about category theory is that it allows you to avoid repeating certain arguments which boil down to so-called “abstract nonsense” ie they have nothing to do with the specific objects you’re dealing with but rather are a consequence of very generic mapping relationships between them. maybe better versed people can give specifics.
as a very broad example there are multiple ways to define a “homology” (ex simplicial, singular, etc) functor associating certain groups to topological spaces as invariants. but the arguments needed to prove properties of the relationships between those groups can be derived from very general properties of the definitions and don’t need to be re-argued from the very fine definitions of each type of homology.
if you know how to handle real or complex coordinate vectors and matrices you’re one only isomorphism away (aka choice of basis) from dealing with an “abstract” vector space (except if you want to talk about finite fields or infinite dimensions). it seems like a really good starting point for many learners’ backgrounds…
>f you know how to handle real or complex coordinate vectors and matrices you’re one only isomorphism away (aka choice of basis) from dealing with an “abstract” vector space
No, you aren't. How would you explain that matrices are both linear transformations and vectors? How would explain what a dual space is? How would you understand the properties of the Fourier transformation, which is a mapping between functions, which are also vectors, and itself also is a vector?
as i said if you want infinite dimensional things like Fourier transforms acting on function spaces you may benefit from additional abstraction. but even those people will benefit from having learned Rn first.
i’m as much with bourbaki as the next guy. but that’s not really how most engineers learn in practice.
as for treating linear maps between finite dimensional spaces as vectors that’s quite straightforward to do in coordinate terms.
again i refer you to the classics like Golub and van Lean that have been reprinted many many times and educated generations.
