Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more chrismustcode's commentslogin

Not a fork opencode is a from scratch project

Claude code is completely closed source and even DMCA’d people reverse engineering it.

https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/25/anthropic-sent-a-takedown-...


I use opencode and never experienced it going through tokens at the speed I experienced Gemini CLI go through.

Cant speak to qwen or crush as I have not used them


The image model is literally the same model


I’d just use sst/opencode if using other models (I use it for Claude through Claude pro subscription too)


There’s something beautiful about creating a drop in replacement for something that improves performance substantially.

ScyllaDB comes to mind


Agreed. I figured nobody would use it otherwise.


Put it in there readme & description. It's a big selling point.


Thanks, I clarified it.


To be fair, many people have token stabbing needs.


When I ask it do to do something in cursor it goes full sherlock thinking about every possible outcome.

Just claude 4 sonnet with thinking just has a bit think then does it


The playwright MCP


Very cool—It seems to allow access to the page itself, not to the network or console tabs, correct?


The orgs investing millions usually aren’t looking to invest small or even profitable most the time.

If there’s a good growth story contact people who write smaller checks who would also be interested in using the product.


Would you be okay for Google to warn anyone when entering a website on chrome that they are taking a risk because they offer payment options other than Google pay?

Its about freedom and openness of platforms.

‘It’s fine because people will ignore it’ doesn’t make something okay.


>Would you be okay for Google to warn anyone when entering a website on chrome that they are taking a risk because they offer payment options other than Google pay? Its about freedom and openness of platforms.

>‘It’s fine because people will ignore it’ doesn’t make something okay.

I can give an anecdotal example of my father who is bit old, knows some basic tech, but had been at the receiving end of some financial fraud (some clowns pretended to be stock trading experts, thankfully nothing happened as he figured it out before any money was sent).

You and I might be technologically sophisticated enough to know what's what. That being said I feel the likelihood of scammy apps like those on App store for iOS a lot less likely but not zero. That being said, on Chrome, one does have many many options for reliable payment gateways and not using them can be an easy way to figure out if it is risky or not.

If Google were to force Google Pay on Chrome, that would be clearly wrong. Options should exist.

And I feel Apple should allow Fortnite for that very reason. You cannot ban someone for not wanting to use Apple Pay, the same way Chrome cannot and should not ban a website if they are using a non Google related payment gateway.


I see plenty of sites that link to outside websites that issue a warning first. The app is not a browser.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: