They might not be for long: https://www.theverge.com/news/757434/irobot-earnings-show-ro...

+1 for Audiobookshelf, truly one of the most functional and polished apps I self-host, despite being relatively niche.

I'd appreciate an invite if you have any left, my email is on my HN profile.

Me too please and thank you.

Yes, but only to use the official Bitwarden server. The Vaultwarden project is an alternate server implementation that does not require a license key.

No, a personal license comes with 3 years of updates, after which it continues to be usable without updates.

> Individual licenses are valid for 3 years of updates, but do not expire after 3 years. Only if you wish to use newer versions will an upgrade fee be required.

+1 for Sublime Merge, I use it every day and love it. Also seems to be one of the few git clients with Linux support, surprisingly.

You aren't required to use a real estate agent though (at least in my jurisdiction).

Are there actually any licenses which do not permit training an AI model on the code?

(IANAL) It's a tool, transforming source code. The result thus seems like a derivative work; whether you are or are not allowed to use that in your work depends on the originating license. (And perhaps, your license. E.g., you can't derive from a GPL project and license it as MIT, as the GPL doesn't permit that. But to license as GPL would be fine. But this minimal example assumes all the input to Copilot was GPL, which I rather doubt is true, and I don't think we even know what the input was.)

I think there might be some in this thread who don't consider these derivatives, for whatever reason, but it seems to be that if rangeCheck() passes de minimis, then the output from Copilot almost certainly does, too. That a tool is doing the copying and mutating, as opposed to a human, seems immaterial to it all. (Now, I don't know that I agree with rangeCheck() not being de minimis … and yet.) Or they think that Copilot is "thinking", which, ha, no.

Postpartum depression is a real thing and very common. I believe it's more of a hormonal response and less about a lack of attention, though

I don't think it's common for women with PPD to kill their child. If anything they kill themselves. I agree it's nothing to do with attention, and I think it's facile and callous to imply otherwise without any factual/scientific basis.