Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more atemerev's commentslogin

Discipline? In gamedev? The industry which famously modeled trains as hats and was proud of it?


And why is that a problem if it works? What if I told you that games also don't simulate each atom individually?


Absolutely not a problem, in fact, I enjoy this. But asking game developers for "discipline" is akin to asking frontend developers for forward compatibility - simply not in their culture.


Meanwhile I love the "trains as hats" hack.


I love it too, but what game developers never have, never will and probably even never should — is discipline


Because implementing _useful_ AI features is hard.


What do you think is hard about it? What do you think Slack needs to do to enable this feature?


Useful summarization of long dialogues is harder than it looks.


What do you think is hard about it? What do you think Slack needs to do to enable this feature?


UBI sadly is purely a fantasy. We don't have money even for retirement funding, which shows cracks in every country. And UBI is basically a lifetime pension.


> We don't have money even for retirement funding

We only don't have it because we refuse to collect it. There is enough wealth in the world to end hunger, poverty and allow people to age to death in dignity, but we lack the political will to achieve any of these things.


In countries without sovereign currencies it's more complicated, but in the US money wouldn't even need to be collected (technically it would need to be collected/added as debt, but that's entirely due to the Constitution and not some kind of natural law). The only real considerations needed to spend are whether or not adding more debt is politically viable and whether or not percepetions of and expectations for inflation are manageable. A UBI would be way too big to be able to avoid triggering inflation expectations and opportunism. Ending hunger would be much more manageable as the costs are very low relative to the impact and so it could be more easily hidden from financial doom-speakers.


Nominal wealth is useless if supply of products and services is in decline. The population histogram of pretty much all developed societies has passed the curve where the supply of labor is decreasing so that “wealth” will be competing to buy less and less labor.

US federal government alone spends trillions of dollars on wealth transfers from workers to non workers via Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, along with a few other program. And even that doesn’t guarantee you will be able to see a doctor in a timely manner.


Hunger is easy. It is housing, medicine and education that are unsolvable.

And no, even if you skin all the rich and put all their money to UBI, it will only last a year or two (you can take Excel and calculate). The bulk of income and taxes comes from the middle class.


We have the money, it's just flowing into making the top 5% comfortable and the top 0.0005% really comfortable.

Real estate in particular (but there are others) is a bottomless pit that society dumps money into, and speculators scoop money out of.


Just try and calculate. The rich are rich, but there are too few of them. Even $1000 UBI (which is not enough for anything) is like $3.2 trillion per year. All the rich taken together do not earn this much.


I'm also curious how UBI won't turn into the same convoluted mess that our tax laws have become. I doubt it would stay universal for long.


Was at your place two weeks ago. Was selling things. Found a job finally by a sheer stroke of luck within my network (cold applying never worked for 7 months).

I wish you all the best and hope you find a job too.


This is a damn s*icide for the country, they are unaliving themselves on turbo, aren't they?


It's not great here. Send help.


I'm sorry but the word "turbo" evokes a model of environmentally damaging Internal Combustion Engines (ICE). Your comment is doubly offensive i will have to report it.


Hey! quit having fun down here!


What monospace font is this? Really good


Code blocks use Iosevka (slightly configured - https://codeberg.org/pwy/website/src/commit/721438bc7d14789c...).

Screenshots use Berkeley Mono (my "daily driver" font).


Next has enshittifed themselves some time ago. Everything that goes through the VC cycle does that eventually.

I am happy for them and their money, but I can't use this anymore. I take Vite as the default option now, but I would prefer something more lightweight.


Well, this is exactly what I use AI for.

I start to experiment with coding agents to try some things to make me unstuck. These are cheap to try.

Then, the outcome is either "wow, this can actually work" or "but this is bullshit, and will never work, let me do it myself the right way!"

Win/win.


There is no such thing as "secondhand ADHD", just as like there is no secondhand autism or secondhand broken legs. ADHD is a chronic, genetically determined, serious, incurable and sometimes fatal disease (about 6-8% suicide rates, and a very high probability to end up in prison).


It's a figure of speech.


Not to me.


You are a security researcher. Your mind is trained to find and mitigate vulnerabilities. Including the vulnerabilities in finance / tax reporting.

You'll think of something. If you can hack one system, you can hack another.

$250k fully legally and with recognition is probably a good incentive not to bother. White hats have their privileges.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: