This must be one of the stupidest article I have ever read.
The first page only shows they have absolutely no clue how statistics works. Of course if you consider every events in the universe completely independent the probability of any large combination of those will be very low. But it is of course not the case with all the conditions they describe, those are highly correlated and P(A|B)P(B)>P(A)P(B) for all of those.
Hm, misleadingt title and abstract. Basically animal food source is more dense in protein, so cheaper. If you constrain the price of the meals, optimal solution will of course favour animal source.
In the intro they even say for western country it food source would not matter because we're above minimum protein intake.
Very misleading, not sure how this title passed the bulshit test.
Very biased piece, written by somebody acutely grieving, and lacking in the very thing she deplores: lack of data except for two select studies that goes in her direction.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314482391_Chaosmic_...