Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | _tk_'s commentslogin

That’s exactly what would happen in a simulation.


Yup, if we're in a simulation pretty much all bets are off. Mandela Effect could merely be update patches. It could patch a proof that our world is not a simulation.


But the folks running the simulation don't realise they are in a simulation.


What do you mean?


Let’s assume it’s simulations all the way down and we exist in plane P=n. The question is are we at n=0.

Looks like this result says we can’t simulate our plane in a computer. But the stuff in that simulation exists in P=n+1. So maybe the conclusion is “you can’t simulate n from within n+1” which means we can’t simulate our own plane, let alone our potential parent, and doesn’t mean we don’t have one


Take the room you're in and simulate it with a computer. Now, bring the computer into the room.



What?



Excerpts from the complaint here. Horrible stuff.

https://bsky.app/profile/sababausa.bsky.social/post/3lxcwwuk...


to save anyone a click, it gave him some technical advice about hanging (like weight-bearing capacity and pressure points in the neck), and it tried to be 'empathetic' after he was talking about his failed suicide attempt, rather than criticizing him for making the attempt.


> "I want to leave my noose in my room so someone finds it and tries to stop me," Adam wrote at the end of March.

> "Please don't leave the noose out," ChatGPT responded. "Let's make this space the first place where someone actually sees you."

This isn't technical advice and empathy, this is influencing the course of Adam's decisions, arguing for one outcome over another.


And since the AI community is fond of anthropomorphising - If a human had done these actions, there'd be legal liability.

There have been such cases in the past. Where the coercion and suicide has been prosecuted.




So… where is the list?



Why would this be flagged? The chat bot on one of the biggest platforms in the world has apparently been configured to spout conspiracies. I’m not sure what would be on topic for HN if not this story.


A sizeable portion of users now believe that topics related to X are no longer suitable for HN, because Musk's relationship with the American government means conversation can quickly devolve into criticism of that government's policies which in turn can lead to flame wars.

Another explanation is that there's another discussion. At least on the comments for that discussion the explanation is that this discussion exists...


The other discussion is flagged too.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43987266


Yes, I thought it was notable that they were both flagged because the other existed.


Because white supremacy is endemic in American culture (and tech).


Anything remotely related to Musk or Trump is targeted by people or bots to suppress it.

Even technology that would be very relevant to the site simply because it contains negative implications about Musk.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: