Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | CursedSilicon's commentslogin

Big disagree. ABIT were the kings of build-your-own-PC in the 90's up through the early 2000's

Right, so how is that different than what I said?

How is a small motherboard manufacturer 25 years after minor popularity in a sub-community not niche of niche?


Hard disagree.

Hacker news is IMO a niche community anyway, and I'd say the crossover between people who built their own PCs 25 years ago, during the golden years of overclocking and hacker news readers is pretty huge actually.

If you don't think this sort of article is a good fit here I don't think you are really in the target demographic anyway.


Whenever I see people decry it as "anti Tesla" or "anti Elon" I just wonder "what have they done they can be covered positively?"

While I'm an out and proud "Tesla hater" and freely admit my own bias. The defenders never actually seem to have any "look here's something good that [site] overlooked!" It's just whining about the site being anti-Tesla


Its not about complementing the bad with some good. Its about how much the bad is exxagerated.

Is it 'exaggeration' when it's all that's there to report on?

Would it be less 'exaggeration' if the site only talked about Tesla "half" the time? (that is to say, just ignored Tesla rather than reported on issues)


Is this an impromptu turing test?

>Everybody knows LLMs are not alive and don't think, feel, want

Sorry, uh. Have you met the general population? Hell. Look at the leader of the "free world"

To paraphrase the late George Carlin "imagine the dumbest person you know. Now realize 50% of people are stupider than that!"


While I agree with your sentiment, the actual quote is subtly different, which changes the meaning:

"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."


> "imagine the dumbest person you know. Now realize 50% of people are stupider than that!"

That's not how Carlin's quote goes.

You would know this if you paid attention to what you wrote and analyzed it logically. Which is ironic, given the subject.


That's why I used the phrase "to paraphrase"

You would know this if you paid attention to what I wrote and analyzed it logically. Which is ironic, given the subject.


You paraphrased it incorrectly

… so presenting it as a paraphrase is misleading.

That's awfully subjective

Everything is subjective. That doesn't mean you can't compare Dodge Neon of operating systems to Lamborghini Huracán.

I too, enjoy having my DNA samples taken and my phones contents downloaded as an agent scrolls through 5 years of my social media history for wrongthink against Doritos Flamin' Führor

Henry Kissinger? I thought you died!

Hashing might not work since the stream itself would be a variable bitrate, meaning the individual pixels would differ and therefore the computed file hash


They're using perceptual hashing, not cryptographic hashing of raw pixels. So it's invariant to variable bitrate, compression, etc.


How does perceptual hashing work?

Have you got any recommendations for further reading on this topic?


These are two articles I liked that are referenced in the Python ImageHash library on PyPi, second article is a follow-up to the first.

Here's paraphrased steps/result from first article for hashing an image:

1. Reduce size. The fastest way to remove high frequencies and detail is to shrink the image. In this case, shrink it to 8x8 so that there are 64 total pixels.

2. Reduce color. The tiny 8x8 picture is converted to a grayscale. This changes the hash from 64 pixels (64 red, 64 green, and 64 blue) to 64 total colors.

3. Average the colors. Compute the mean value of the 64 colors.

4. Compute the bits. Each bit is simply set based on whether the color value is above or below the mean.

5. Construct the hash. Set the 64 bits into a 64-bit integer. The order does not matter, just as long as you are consistent.

The resulting hash won't change if the image is scaled or the aspect ratio changes. Increasing or decreasing the brightness or contrast, or even altering the colors won't dramatically change the hash value.

https://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/432-Lo...

https://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/529-Ki...


In the same way that Shazam can identify songs despite the audio source being terrible over a phone, mixed with background noise. It doesn't capture the audio as a WAV and then scan its database for an exact matching WAV segment.

I'm sure it is way more complex than this, but shazam does some kind of small windowed FFT and distills it to the dominant few frequencies. It can then find "rhythms" of these frequency patterns, all boiled down to a time stream of signature data. There is some database which can look up these fingerprints. One given fingerprint might match multiple songs, but since they have dozens of fingerprints spread across time, if most of them point to the same musical source, that is what gets ID'd.



Possibly one of the better known (and widely used?) implementations is Microsoft's PhotoDNA, that may be a suitable starting point.


wouldn't LSH (Locality Sensitive Hashing) make more sense here?


Perceptual hashes are a type of locality sensitive hash.


Now show what banks (and where) have apps targeting that phone

Not glorified webpages. Full on apps. Preferably by the banks themselves (sorry bedroom hobbyists, I don't quite trust you with my banking details yet!)


Why don't you like "glorified" webpages? Some banks give you a full control on those. Also, I can run Android apps with Waydroid.


There was a native Linux client available when the game was still in alpha. Circa 2002/2003

Blizzard leans heavily on making sure their software is portable!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: