Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Or, you know, current day European social democracies.

You can’t help but laugh at the amount of hysteria about Mamdani. No cost childcare? Free buses? Using existing rent control regulations to keep rent affordable? Oh no



I'm not sure there are many countries that actually have free childcare and free buses. Talk about it, yes. Subsidized to a degree, yes. But pretty much every municipal transport is already heavily subsidized.


There are fundamental differences between Europe and the US. The US is not magically going to become Europe by electing a "left" mayor.

Also this is a city- since when does a mayor set economic policies.

Last I checked free busses, and no cost childcare, still need someone to pay for them.

Rent control, if the rent is low, there won't be any rental property. What's the next step, forcing people to build? The city will build?

I guess we shall see. The sad thing is that people didn't vote because they considered all the ideas and the implications. The other sad thing is that maybe Mamdani was the best candidate.


> since when does a mayor set economic policies.

Childcare, buses and rent control are all under the control of the NYC mayor.

> Last I checked free busses, and no cost childcare, still need someone to pay for them.

Most places have “free” roads and public schools and survive just fine. The point in invoking Europe is to say that having a higher tax burden and getting more public services in return is not some crazy North Korean dystopia. It’s pretty common. If it’s not for you that’s absolutely fine, just don’t move to NYC.


Europe isn't just simply about taxes and services. There are many more layers to the difference between where the US sits and Europe. Hopefully this is obvious.

I believe Europe has plenty of toll roads as well ;)

I find it weird that these priorities are set at a level of a city. I mean NYC is a big city but it is part of a state and a country. There are much better economies of scale and ability to exert control at the levels of government these policies usually exist at.


NYC has a bigger population than the entire country of Ireland. It definitely has the economy of scale to operate public transport and education.

> There are many more layers to the difference between where the US sits and Europe. Hopefully this is obvious.

It is exceedingly obvious. The reason for my comparison wasn’t because I think they are the same place, I was responding to a commenter who said North Korea and Kabul were appropriate comparison points for Mamdani’s plans. My point is simply that immediately invoking North Korea is hysteria.


> NYC has a bigger population than the entire country of Ireland

New York City's economy [1], were it a country, would sit at No. 18 in the world between the Netherlands and Saudi Arabia [2].

The only EU members with economies larger than its are the Netherlands, Spain, Italy, France and Germany.

(New York City's budget [3] is bigger than the military budgets of every country on the planet except for America, China and Russia's [4]. On par with the budgets of Ukraine and the Philippines [5].)

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_New_York_City $1.3tn

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nomi...

[3] https://council.nyc.gov/press/2025/06/30/2915/ $116bn

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_highest...

[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_governmen...


So it's gonna be the city-state of New York?

I guess we'll watch this experiment unfold.

Appreciate the data points though but I think a city is ... a city. We don't usually talk about "economy of a city" because it's not that meaningful. If NYC wished to become a country I guess they can go for it.


> So it's gonna be the city-state of New York?

> I guess we'll watch this experiment unfold.

None of this is new, though. Mamdani being elected will make no difference to the scale at which NYC operates.


> We don't usually talk about "economy of a city" because it's not that meaningful

You cited “economies of scale and ability to exert control at the levels of government these policies usually exist at.” New York has those.

The point at which it becomes “not meaningful” is well after the point that most countries in the EU turn into rounding errors.


Just saw a bunch of funny videos with people asking NYC bus drivers if the busses are free already and they all having a good laugh at that. Supposedly the MTA has $48.4B or so debt: "The MTA's long-term debt was around $48.4 billion in late 2023, a figure that has grown from $25.8 billion in 2010."

Looking at the financials they are already subsidized to the tune of >50% : https://council.nyc.gov/budget/wp-content/uploads/sites/54/2... ... So the city needs to find at least $7.5B a year just to keep growing their debt at the same rate. But that's ok- if every person in the city just pays another $400 or so a year in taxes they'll get that covered. Socialism...


The people who lucked into rent-controlled suites will sublet them for a much higher rent https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20160517-this-is-one-ci...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: