Honestly, I think what they offer might be the best solution you can hope for: one button "I don't care", one button personalize and in it one button "disable all". People who don't care and just want the site to work aren't lost, people who care aren't lost, people who want to personnalize aren't lost. If you care, it's two click total to disable everything, and it's very easy to find (the bright right "deny").
Should they have "refuse all" along with "accept all" ? Yes.
Should "refuse all" be the default and thus features be disabled ? I'm not entirely sure (see what they list in the personnalize, it's youtube videos and twitter cards ...).
In terms of the intent of the law (give control to the user and make it easy to opt out), I would say they are doing fine. As opposed to all those shitty websites where you can't find how to disable, or you have to disable a bazillion things by hand.
Refuse all needs to be the default, because that is the law. Even when it comes to the intent of the law (which is to give control to the user and also not make lazy users "accidentally" give up all of their right to privacy) they are not doing fine. They're doing better than their peers, who have made even more malicious choice dialogs.
I agree as a matter of "how is the law written now", I was talking more of a "how I hope as a user that it could/will be".
If we go with everything off by default by law and try to apply it, we will end up with a broken web, meaning websites will not follow the law because it makes a stupid and not be punished for it because it's become the norm, just like the (bad) cookie law.
I'm ok with how it is on their site (based on how easy it is to disable, myself I disable all on such sites); it's quick with only 2 clics total, and it's easy to figure out with a clear color scheme and wording.
It's important to understand we make the law not for us tech users, but for everyone. Finding a solution that works for everyone and gives them what they want is important.
Remember that consent is only needed if you can't rely on one of the other conditions for storing that data. If you are, say, selling a product, there's no need to ask for consent at all for using the customer's data to bill them and ship it. If the user changes some setting in your site, there's no need to ask for consent to store that preference.
Websites will learn to follow the law or they will die. And the web will be better off for it. Stacking dark patterns has been a thing for way too long, it is high time that movement dies.
Should they have "refuse all" along with "accept all" ? Yes.
Should "refuse all" be the default and thus features be disabled ? I'm not entirely sure (see what they list in the personnalize, it's youtube videos and twitter cards ...).
In terms of the intent of the law (give control to the user and make it easy to opt out), I would say they are doing fine. As opposed to all those shitty websites where you can't find how to disable, or you have to disable a bazillion things by hand.